Attitudes van de fietsforens

Authors

  • Eva Heinen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21825/agora.v26i4.2427

Abstract

‘Harde factoren’ verklaren niet waarom individuen in vergelijkbare situaties en met een gelijke achtergrond een verschillende beslissing maken om wel of niet te fietsen. Dit artikel identificeert drie fietsattitudes: "direct nut", "bewustzijn" en "veiligheid". Deze attitudes verklaren mede de keuze om naar het werk te fietsen en de frequentie waarmee gefietst wordt. 

References

Ajzen, I. (1991) The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 2, 179-211.

Gatersleben, B. en K.M. Appleton. (2007) Contemplating cycling to work: attitudes and perceptions in different stages of change. Transportation Research Part A, 41, 4, 302-312.

Gatersleben, B. and D. Uzzell (2007) Affective appraisals of the daily commute. Comparing perceptions of drivers, cyclist, and users of public transport, Environment and Behavior, 39, 5, 416-431.

Handy, S. (2005) Critical assessment of the literature on the relationships among transportation, land use, and physical activity. Transportation research board and the institute of medicine committee on physical activity, health, transportation, and land use, Washington, D.C.

Heinen, E., B. van Wee en K. Maat (2010) Commuting by bicycle, an overview of literature. Transport Reviews 30, 1, 59-96.

Heinen, E., B. van Wee en K. Maat (nog te verschijnen) The role of attitudes toward characteristics of bicycle commuting on the choice to cycle to work over various distances, Transportation Research Part D.

Triandis, H.C. (1980). Values, attitudes and interpersonal behavior, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, University of Nebraska Press.

Wee, B. van, P. Rietveld en H. Meurs (2006) Is average daily travel time expenditure constant? In search of explanations for an increase in average travel time. Journal of Transport Geography 14, 2, 109-122.

Published

2010-12-01