http://206.189.126.38:8087/index.php/RP/issue/feedRes Publica2021-06-28T05:53:24+00:00Stijn MeerssemanStijn.Meersseman@UGent.beOpen Journal Systemshttp://206.189.126.38:8087/index.php/RP/article/viewDe macht van partijen in België sinds 1981 - particratie revisited2021-03-23T11:57:10+00:00Karel Van Nieuwenhuyselibservice@ugent.beStefaan Fierslibservice@ugent.beFrederik Verledenlibservice@ugent.be2018-12-30T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 0 http://206.189.126.38:8087/index.php/RP/article/view/17777Ze halen hun slag wel thuis: over particratie en het aanpassingsvermogen van Belgische partijen2021-03-16T21:05:22+00:00Jean-Benoit Piletlibservice@ugent.bePetra Meierlibservice@ugent.be<p>Particracy has been widely used to describe Belgian politics after World War II. Yet, Belgian politics has changed. We examine five changes – the federalisation of the state architecture, diversification of the demos, erosion of political support, party’s dealignment and personalisation of politics – to evaluate how they have affected particracy in Belgium. The answer is twofold: particracy is still very strong, but it has changed. The three traditional party families that had institutionalised particracy in Belgium (Christian-democrats, socialists and liberals) had to face new challengers. They co-opted the most moderate ones (greens, regionalists), while excluding others (radical right/left). Intraparty democracy/participatory/transparency reforms, or changes to the electoral system, all of them opening the political system, were also implemented, but parties were able to overcome them. Yet, the ever-growing gap between traditional parties and citizens and the growth of new parties building upon voters’ dissatisfaction with traditional parties, may put particracy more radically into question.</p>2018-12-30T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 0 http://206.189.126.38:8087/index.php/RP/article/view/17778Twee handen op één buik ? Hoe en waarom de mediatisering van de Vlaamse politiek en particratie hand in hand gaan2021-06-28T05:53:24+00:00Peter Van Aelstlibservice@ugent.be<p>There is a growing consensus that politics have become mediatised. News media have become more independent and are more guided by their own routines and standards and less by what political actors deem important. However, this paper argues that this has not led to a decrease of the power of political parties. In Belgium, particracy and mediatisation seem to go hand in hand. There are mainly two reasons for this. Firstly, media attention focuses heavily on politicians with power and in that sense, media logic and party logic overlap. Secondly, parties have adjusted well to the media and their logic, among others by integrating journalists in the party organisation. We expect that social media will gradually become more important for politicians, but that this evolution too will change little to the central position of political parties in our democracy.</p>2018-12-30T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 0 http://206.189.126.38:8087/index.php/RP/article/view/17779La Belgique confédérale wil unitair beleid voeren zonder democratie2021-03-14T10:56:15+00:00Wilfried Dewachterlibservice@ugent.be2018-12-30T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2018 http://206.189.126.38:8087/index.php/RP/article/view/17781Is de politieke wetenschap de voeling met de politieke praktijk kwijt ?2021-03-14T11:00:27+00:00inleiding libservice@ugent.be2018-12-30T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 0 http://206.189.126.38:8087/index.php/RP/article/view/17782Politicologie hoeft niet ten dienste te staan van de politici2021-03-14T11:03:23+00:00Kris Deschouwerlibservice@ugent.be2018-12-30T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 0 http://206.189.126.38:8087/index.php/RP/article/view/17783Relatie politicologie-politiek is veranderd, maar niet verslechterd2021-03-14T11:06:01+00:00Stefaan Walgravelibservice@ugent.be2018-12-30T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 0 http://206.189.126.38:8087/index.php/RP/article/view/17784De revolutie eet haar eigen kinderen op2021-03-14T12:00:23+00:00Marc Hooghelibservice@ugent.be2018-12-30T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2018 http://206.189.126.38:8087/index.php/RP/article/view/17785Waarom Dewachter gelijk heeft2021-03-15T14:35:08+00:00Bart Maddenslibservice@ugent.be2018-12-30T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 0 http://206.189.126.38:8087/index.php/RP/article/view/17786Politicologie en politici, twee aparte werelden2021-03-14T11:20:42+00:00Carl Devoslibservice@ugent.be2018-12-30T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 0 http://206.189.126.38:8087/index.php/RP/article/view/17787Slechts nu en dan een bui2021-03-14T11:22:59+00:00Joop van Holsteynlibservice@ugent.be2018-12-30T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 0 http://206.189.126.38:8087/index.php/RP/article/view/17788Het potentieel van denktanks als strategische partner in beleidsvorming2021-03-14T11:29:09+00:00Bert Franssenlibservice@ugent.beDarren Halpinlibservice@ugent.be2018-12-30T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 0 http://206.189.126.38:8087/index.php/RP/article/view/17789Parlementarisering als tweerichtingsverkeer : een verklaring voor voorafgaande parlementaire consultatie bij militaire operaties2021-03-14T11:28:15+00:00Daan Foncklibservice@ugent.beYf Rekerslibservice@ugent.be2018-12-30T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 0 http://206.189.126.38:8087/index.php/RP/article/view/17790Auteursinfo2021-03-14T11:31:34+00:00Editor Res Publicalibservice@ugent.be2018-12-30T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 0