Connecting the Past to the Future of Computer-assisted Language Learning: Theory, Practice, and Research
Abstract
Computer-assisted language learning (CALL) has established itself as a fruitful area of inquiry that contributes to language education and educational technology. CALL has witnessed the endeavor of exploiting technology for robust and meaningful language learning and teaching from scholars over a period of more than fifty years. With the continued advancement of technology, the field of CALL are facing new challenges and possibilities in terms of theory, practice, and research in this new era. Thus, a review of major trends in past CALL and a critical projection of future CALL are needed in order to capture the dynamics and opportunities for future technology-enhanced language learning. This article provides an overview of the evolution of theory and practice in CALL research. The author explores the state of the art and important future areas of inquiry of CALL by addressing emerging technologies. This paper concludes with theoretical and methodological considerations for approaching CALL today and beyond.
DOI:10.2458/azu_itlt_v8i1_han
Keywords
References
Beatty, K. (2010). Teaching & Researching: Computer-Assisted Language Learning. London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833774
Blin, F. (2016). Towards an “ecological†CALL theory: theoretical perspectives and their instantiation in CALL research and practice. In F. Farr & L. Murray(Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language learning and technology (pp. 39–54). New York: Routledge
Chen, H. (2013). Identity Practices of Multilingual Writers in Writers in Social Networking Spaces. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2), 143–170. https://doi.org/10125/44328
Chik, A. (2014) Digital gaming and language learning: Autonomy and community. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 85–100.
Chik, A., & Ho, J. (2017). Learn a language for free: Recreational learning among adults. System, 69, 162–171.
Chun, D., Kern, R., & Smith, B. (2016). Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning. Modern Language Journal, 100(100 (Supplement 2016)), 64–80. http://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12302
Codreanu, T. & Combe, C. (2018). Glocal Tensions: Exploring the Dynamics of Intercultural Communication Through a Language Learner’s Vlog. In Screens and Scenes: Multimodal Communication in Online Intercultural Encounters (pp.40-61). New York, NY: Routledge.
De Bot, K., Lowie, W. & Verspoor, M. (2007). A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21.
Egbert, J., Hanson-Smith, E. & Chao, C. (2007). Introduction: Foundations for teaching and learning, in J. Egbert and E.Hanson-Smith (eds), CALL Environments: Research, Practice and Critical Issues, 2nd ed (pp. 1–14). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Gao, X. (2007). A tale of Blue Rain Café: A study on the online narrative construction about a community of English learners on the Chinese mainland. System 35(2), 259–270.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2016). Emerging technologies: Augmented reality and language learning: From annotated vocabulary to place-based mobile games. Language Learning & Technology, 20(3), 9–19.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Chasing the butterfly effect: Informal language learning online as a complex system. Language Learning & Technology, 22(2), 8–27. https://doi.org/10125/44643
Han, Y. (2019). Exploring multimedia, mobile learning, and place-based learning in linguacultural education. Language Learning & Technology, 23(3), 29–38. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44692
Harrison, R., & Thomas, M. (2009). Identity in online communities: Social networking sites and language learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society, 7(2), 109–124. Retrieved from http://en.scientificcommons.org/51861582
Hubbard, P. (2008). Twenty-five years of theory in the CALICO Journal. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 387-399.
Hubbard, P., & Levy, M. (2016). Theory in computer-assisted language learning research and practice. In F. Farr & L. Murray (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language learning and technology (pp. 24–38). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657899
Hull, G. A., Stornaiuolo, A., & Sahni, U. (2010). Cultural citizenship and cosmopolitan practice: Global youth communicate online. English Education, 42(4), 331–367.
Kallioniemi, P., Posti, L.-P., Hakulinen, J., Turunen, M., Keskinen, T., & Raisamo, R. (2015). Berlin Kompass: Multimodal Gameful Empowerment for Foreign Language Learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 43(4), 429–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239515588166
Kern, R. (2014). Technology as Pharmakon: The promise and perils of the internet for foreign language education. Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12065.x
Knowles, G. (1986). The role of the computer in the teaching of phonetics. In Leech, G.and Candlin, C.N. (eds), Computers in English Language Teaching and Research: Selected Papers from the 1984 Lancaster Symposium ‘Computers in English Language Education and Research’. London: Longman.
Kramsch, C. (Ed.). (2002). Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives. London:Continuum.
Lai, C., & Zheng, D. (2018). Self-directed use of mobile devices for language learning beyond the classroom. ReCALL, 30(3), 299-318.
Lam, W. S. E. (2000). Literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the Internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 457–482.
Lam, W. S. E. (2004). Second language socialization in a bilingual chat room: Global and local considerations. Language Learning & Technology, 8, 44–65.
Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford University Press.
Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2012). A tale of tweets: Analyzing microblogging among language learners. System, 40(1), 48–63.
Mills, N. (2011). Situated Learning through Social Networking Communities: The Development of Joint Enterprise, Mutual Engagement, and a Shared Repertoire. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 345-368. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/calicojournal.28.2.345
Neuwirth, C.M. & Kaufer, D.S. (1992). Computers and composition studies: articulating a pattern of discovery. In Hawisher, G. and LeBlanc, P. (eds), Re-imagining Computers and Composition (pp. 173-90). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Heinemann.
Otto, S. E. K. (2017). From past to present: a hundred years of technology for L2 learning. In C. A. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 10–25). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Scholz, K. (2017). Encouraging free play: Extramural digital game-based languagelearning as a complex adaptive system. Calico Journal, 34(1), 39–57.
Schulze, M. (2008). AI in CALL: Artificially inflated or almost imminent? CALICO Journal, 25(3), 510–527.
Schreiber, B. R. (2015). ‘I Am What I Am’: Multilingual identity and digital translanguaging. Language Learning & Technology, 19(3), 69–87.
Sinyor, R. (1997). An analysis of student behavior and error sources in an Italian CALL context. CALICO, 14, 51–64.
Stockwell, G. (2014). Exploring theory in computer-assisted language learning. In X. Deng & R. Seow (Eds), Alternative Pedagogies in the English Language & Communication Classroom: Selected Papers from the Fourth CELC Symposium for English Language Teachers (pp. 25-30). Singapore: Centre for English Language Communication, National University of Singapore.
Stockwell, G. (2016). Mobile language learning. In F. Farr & L. Murray (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language learning and technology (pp. 296-307). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657899
Thorne, S. L. (2010). The ‘Intercultural Turn’ and Language Learning in the Crucible of New Media. In F. Helm & S. Guth (eds.), Telecollaboration 2.0 for Language and Intercultural Learning (pp. 139-164). Bern: Peter Lang.
Thorne, S. L., & Hellermann, J. (2017). Mobile augmented reality: Hyper contextualization and situated language usage events. In J. Colpaert, A. Aerts, R. Kern, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the XVIII International CALL Conference: CALL in Context (pp. 721–730). Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley.
van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: a sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer academic.
Vazquez, C. D., Nyati, A. A., Luh, A., Fu, M., Aikawa, T., & Maes, P. (2017). Serendipitous language learning in mixed reality. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA ’17, 2172–2179. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053098
Wu, Y., Yuan, Z., Zhou, D., & Cai, Y. (2013). A mobile Chinese calligraphic training system using virtual reality technology. AASRI Procedia, 5, 200-208. doi:10.1016/j.aasri.2013.10.079
Yang, Y., Crook, C., & O’Malley, C. (2014). Can a social networking site support afterschool group learning of Mandarin? Media and Technology, 39(3), 267-282. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2013.839564