Student Choice, Instructor Flexibility: Moving Beyond the Blended Instructional Model
Abstract
Due to the rapid increase in online course enrollments, online and blended education receives much research attention. However, a paucity of research exists for the Hybrid-Flexible (HyFlex) instructional model. This model allows students flexibility about how to participate in lecture and is geared toward providing students with educational choices and incorporating instructional technologies that mirror the personal technologies students use every day. This article outlines the development and testing of a modified HyFlex instructional model specifically designed for large, on-campus courses where students had three attendance mode choices (live online, face-to-face, or view a recorded session). To support curricular goals, the instructor implemented technology affording live lecture streaming, polling, and backchannel communication with negligible cost to students and little cost to the department. Highlighted results indicate the modified HyFlex instructional model had no negative impact on student performance in the class, both in overall learning and on individual grades. Furthermore, students greatly enjoyed the educational choices and overwhelmingly reported the incorporation of technology increased their participation in class and comprehension of course content. The authors discuss the findings, address study limitations, and offer suggestions for future HyFlex research.
DOI: 10.2458/azu_itet_v1i1_miller
Keywords
References
Aargard, H., Bowen, K., & Olesova, L. (2010). Hotseat: Operating the backchannel in large lectures. Educause Quarterly, 33(3). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/hotseat-opening-backchannel-large-lectures
Abdous, M., & Yoshimure, M. (2010). Learner outcomes and satisfaction: A comparison of live
video-streamed instruction, satellite broadcast instruction, and face-to-face instruction. Computers & Education, 55(2), 733-741.
Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M.C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Atkinson, C. (2009). The backchannel: How audiences are using Twitter and social media and changing presentations forever. Berkeley: New Riders Press.
Beatty, B. (2006). Designing the HyFlex world [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http://itec.sfsu.edu/hyflex/beatty_hyflex_aect2006.ppt
Beatty, B. (2010). Hybrid courses with flexible participation – the HyFlex design. Draft v2.2. Retrieved from http://itec.sfsu.edu/hyflex/hyflex_course_design_theory_2.2.pdf
Bruff, D. (2009). Teaching with classroom response systems: Creating active learning environments. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Buhagiar, T., & Potter, R. (2010). To stream or not to stream in a quantitative business course.
Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3. Retrieved from http://www.aabri.com /manuscripts/09417.pdf
Campt, D., & Freeman, M. (2009). Talk through the hand: Using audience response keypads to augment the facilitation of small group dialogue. International Journal of Public Participation, 3(1), 80-107.
Dahlstrom, E. (2012). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2012 (Research Report). Educause Center for Applied Research. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/ecar-study-undergraduate-students-and-information-technology-2012
Delmas, R., Garfield, J., Ooms, A., & Chance, B. (2007). Assessing students’ conceptual understanding after a first course in statistics. Statistics Education Research Journal, 6(2), 28-58.
Educause Learning Initiative (ELI) Publication. (2010). Seven things you should know about backchannel communication. Educause Library. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library /pdf/ELI7057.pdf
Fernando, N. J. S., Cole, J. V., Tan, P. L., & Freitas, J. C. (2011, June). Live Lecture Streaming
for Distributed Learning. Paper presented at Scanning the horizons: Institutional research in a borderless world higher education institutional research network conference, Kingston University. Retrieved from http://www.heir2011.org.uk/conference-papers/papers/Fernando%20HEIR2011.pdf
Filer, D. (2010). Everyone’s answering: using technology to increase classroom participation. Nursing Education Perspective, 31(4), 247-50.
Knapp, L. G., Kelly-Reid, J. E., & Ginder, S. A. (2012). Enrollment in postsecondary institutions, fall 2010; Financial statistics, fiscal year 2010; and Graduation rates, selected cohorts, 2002-2007. U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2012/2012280.pdf
Kyei-Blankson, L. (2009). Enhancing student learning in a graduate research and statistics course with clickers. Educause Quarterly, 32(4). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/enhancing-student-learning-graduate-research-and-statistics-course-clickers
Lenhart, A. (2010). Text messaging becomes centerpiece communication. Pew Research Center Publications. Retrieved from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1572/teens-cell-phones-text-messages
Sloan Consortium. (2012). Effective Practices Award Winners. http://sloanconsortium.org/ep_award_winners
Trip, G. (2011, May 12). Speaking up in class, silently, using social media. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/13/education/13social.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all