Power, identity and biodiversity conservation in the Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico
Abstract
In this article, I analyze how daily conservation discourse and practices create and recreate local identities through the reconfiguration of social relationships brought about by conservation encounters. The mobilization of identity has been a main strategy of the inhabitants of the Lacandon Community Zone and the Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve for maintaining their access to natural resources and benefitting from conservation. In the Lacandon Rainforest, conservation comes at great cost to the local population but, at the same time, offers an opportunity to access monetary and political resources. Because of this tension, the peasants build complex and fractured identities, in an iterative process, assuming different images as they struggle to reconcile their personal desires with the external plan to preserve the forest. Identity in the Lacandon Rainforest, as in other regions impacted by this practice, is a tool in the political struggle.
Keywords: identity, power, biodiversity, conservation, protected areas, Mexico
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, W.M. 2003. Nature and the colonial mind. In Adams, W.M. and M. Mulligan (eds.) Decolonizing nature: strategies for conservation in a post-colonial era. London: Earthscan.
Ascencio Franco, G. 2004. Milpa y ganaderÃa en Ocosingo. In Viquiera J.P. and M.H. Ruz, (eds.) Chiapas. Los rumbos de otra historia. México: UNAM-CIESAS.
Ascencio Franco, G. 2008. Regularización de la propiedad en la Selva Lacandona: cuento de nunca acabar. Tuxtla Gutierrez: Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas.
Barrera, A., A. Gómez Pompa and C. Vázquez Yanes. 1977. El manejo de las selvas mayas: sus implicaciones silvÃcolas y agrÃcolas. Biótica 2(2): 47-61.
Benjamin, T. 1989. A rich land. A poor people. Politics and society in modern Chiapas. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Bezaury Creel, J. and Gutiérrez Carbonel, D. 2009. Ãreas naturales protegidas y desarrollo social en México. In CONABIO (ed.) Capital natural de México Vol. II Estado de Conservación y tendencias de cambio. México: CONABIO.
Bolaños, O. 2011. Redefining identities, redefining landscapes: indigenous identity and land rights struggles in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Cultural Geography 28(1): 45-72.
Braubaker, R. and F. Cooper. 2000. Beyond "identity". Theory and Society 29(1): 1-47.
Brosius, P. 1999. Analyses and interventions: anthropological engagements with the environment. Current Anthropology 40(3): 277-309.
Buda, G., T. Trench and L. Durand. 2014. El aprovechamiento de la palma camedor en la Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, México. ¿Conservación con desarrollo? Estudios Sociales XXII (44): 200-223.
Burguete Cal y Mayor, A. 2013. Etnoterritorios: la dimension cultural de la apropiación del espacio en regiones indÃgenas. In CONABIO (ed.). La biodiversidad en Chiapas: estudio de Estado. México: CONABIO, Gobierno del Estado de Chiapas. Pp. 97-107.
Calleros RodrÃguez, H. 2014. Land, conflict, and political process: the case of the Lancandon Community, Chiapas, Mexico (1972-2012). The Journal of Peasant Studies 41(1): 127-155.
Campbell, L. and A. Vainio-Mattila. 2003. Participatory development and community-based conservation: opportunities missed for lessons learned? Human Ecology 31(3): 417-437.
Castellanos Navarrete, A. and K. Jansen. 2015. Oil palm expansion without enclosure: smallholders and environmental narratives. Journal of Peasant Studies 42(3-4): 791-816.
Carabias, J. 2009. Los niños en la Lacandona. Reforma. 5 Mar.
CONANP. 2015. Reservas de la Biosfera. [accessed February 18, 2015]. http://www.conanp.gob.mx/que_hacemos/reservas_biosfera.php
Contreras Cortés, L.E.U., L.C. Barrera, M.A. Fernández and R.M. Mariaca Méndez. 2013. Manejo de los agroecosistemas en la Comunidad Lacandona de Nahá, Chiapas. EtnobiologÃa 11(3): 34-44.
De Vos, J. 2005. Una tierra para sembrar sueños. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica and CIESAS.
De Vos, J. 2010. Camino del Mayab. Cinco incursiones en el pasado de Chiapas. México: CIESAS.
Durand, L. 2014. ¿Todos Ganan? Neoliberalismo, naturaleza y conservación en México. Sociológica 29(82): 183-223.
Durand, L., F. Figueroa and T. Trench. 2014. Inclusion and exclusion in participation strategies in the Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico. Conservation and Society 12(2): 175-189.
Ervine, K. 2011. Conservation and conflict: the intensification of property rights disputes under market-based conservation in Chiapas, México. Journal of Political Ecology 18: 66-80.
Escobar, A. 1998. Whose knowledge, whose nature? biodiversity, conservation, and the political ecology of social movements. Journal of Political Ecology 5(1): 53-82
Fades, I. 2014. La despolitización de la ecologÃa. Un análisis del proceso REDD+: México y Chiapas. Masters dissertation. Oslo: University of Oslo.
Fearon, J.D. 1999. What is identity (As we now use the Word?). [accessed October 20, 2014]. https://web.stanford.edu/group/fearon-research/cgi-bin/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/What-is-Identity-as-we-now-use-the-word-.pdf
Figueroa, F. and L. Durand. 2015. Poder, élites locales y gobernanza ambiental. El caso de los hijos de comuneros en la Reserva de la Biosfera Montes Azules. In Brenner, L. and R. Rosales (eds.) GeografÃa de la gobernanza. Dinámicas multiescalares de los procesos económicos-ambientales. México: Siglo XXI, UAM Iztapalapa. Pp. 233-251.
GarcÃa Frapolli E., G. Ramos Fernández, E. Galicia and A. Serrano. 2009. The complex reality of biodiversity conservation through Natural Protected Area policy: three cases from the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Land Use Policy 26: 715-722.
Haenn, N. 2016. The middle-class conservationist: social dramas, blurred identity boundaries, and their environmental consequences in Mexican conservation. Current Anthropologist 57(2): 197-218.
Hall, R., M. Edelman, S.M. Borras Jr., I. Scoones, B. White and W. Wolford. 2015. Resistance, acquiescence or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions from below. Journal of Peasant Studies 42(3-4): 467-488.
Hernández Cruz, R., E. Bello Baltazar, G. Montoyagómez and E.I.J. Estrada Lugo. 2005. Social adaptation: ecotourism in the Lacandon Forest. Annals of Tourism Research 32(3): 610-627.
Herrera, C. 2011. El turismo de aventura, opción de indÃgenas para corregir desigualdades, dice Calderón. La Jornada. [accessed February 18, 2015]. http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2011/10/18/politica/015n1pol
INE. 2000. Programa de Manejo Reserva de la Biosfera Montes Azules. México: INE, SEMARNAT.
INEGI, 2012. Anuario estadÃstico del Estado de Chiapas 2012. México: INEGI.
Igoe, D. and D. Brockington. 2007. Neoliberal conservation: a brief introduction. Conservation and Society 5(4): 432-449.
Instituto de Comunicación Social. Gobierno del Estado de Chiapas. 2014 Comunicado: Comuneros de la Selva Lacandona reciben pago económico por servicios ambientales. [accessed September 19, 2014] http://www.icosochiapas.gob.mx/2014/09/19/comuneros-de-la-selva-lacandona-reciben-pago-economico-por-servicios-ambientales/
Legorreta DÃaz, M. del Carmen and C. Márquez Rosano. 2014. ¿Es posible la conservación de las áreas protegidas por decreto? Retoso sociopolÃticos para la gestión ambiental democrática en las comunidades de Nueva Palestina y Frontera Corozal, Ocosingo, Chiapas. In DÃaz Legorreta C., C. Márquez Rosano and T. Trench (eds.). Paradojas de las tierras protegidas en Chiapas. México: UNAM, Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo.
Leyva Solano, X. and G. Ascencio Franco. 2002. Lacandona al filo del agua. México: CIESAS, UNAM and FCE.
Lezama, J.L. 2010. Sociedad, medio ambiente y polÃtica ambiental 1970-2000. In Lezama, J.L. and B. Graizbord (eds.). Los grandes problemas de México vol. 4. México: El Colegio de México.
Li, T.M. 2000. Articulating indigenous identity in Indonesia: resource politics and the tribal slot. Comparative Studies in Society and History 42(1): 149-179.
López, I. 2013. Suspendido el programa REDD Plus, dice SEMAHN. El Heraldo de Chiapas. [accessed December 9, 2014]. http://www.oem.com.mx/elheraldodechiapas/notas/n3045308.htm
Mariscal, A. 2006. Pago la SRA 172 millones a lacandones. La Jornada, March 29.
Mariscal, A. 2014. El fin de la hegemonÃa lacandona en la Selva de Chiapas. Chiapas Paralelo [accessed December 15, 2017] https://www.chiapasparalelo.com/opinion/2014/12/el-fin-de-la-hegemonia-lacandona-en-la-selva-de-chiapas-columna-destacada-2014/
Mendoza, E. 2012. Gobierno privatizará el oxÃgeno de la Selva Lacandona. ContralÃnea. [accessed October 20, 2014]. http://contralinea.info/archivo-revista/index.php/2012/11/11/gobierno-privatizara-el-oxigeno-de-la-selva-lacandona/
Mendoza, E. and R. Dirzo. 1999, Deforestation in Lacandonia (southeast Mexico): evidence for the declaration of the northernmost tropical hot-spot. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 1621-1641.
Milton, K. 1996. Environmentalism and cultural theory. London: Routledge.
Muench, P. 2008. Libro blanco de la selva, Proyecto Desarrollo Social Integrado y Sostenible. Tuxtla Gutiérrez: SecretarÃa de Desarrollo Social del Gobierno del Estado de Chiapas and Unión Europea.
Navarro Olmedo S., N. Haenn, B. Schmook and C. Radel. 2016. The legacy of Mexico's agrarian counter-reforms: reinforcing social hierarchies in Calakmul, Campeche. Journal of Agrarian Change 16(1): 145-167.
Nygren, A. 2006. Representations of tropical forests and forest dwellers in travel accounts of National Geographic. Environmental Values 15(4): 505-525.
O'Brien, K.L. 1998. Sacrificing the forest. environmental struggles in Chiapas. Boulder: Westview Press.
Paladino, S.R. 2005. We are the guardians of the selva: conservation, indigenous communities, and common property in the Selva Lacandona, Mexico. Ph D. dissertation. Athens: University of Georgia.
Perrault, T. 2001. Developing identities: Indigenous mobilization, rural livelihoods, and resource access in Ecuadorian Amazonia. Cultural Geographies 8(4): 381-412.
Porro, N., I. Veiga and D. Mota. 2011. Traditional communities in the Brasilian Amazon and the emergence of new political identities: the struggle of the quebradaeiras de coco de babaçu. Journal of Cultural Geography 28(1): 123-146.
Reik, D.B., A.L. Wilson and D.J. Decker. 2008. Power in natural resource management: an application of theory. Society and Natural Resources 21: 729-739.
Rocheleau, D.E. 2015. Networked, rooted and territorial: green grabbing and resistance in Chiapas. Journal of Peasant Studies 42(3-4): 695-723.
Sarukhán, J. 1991. El último refugio. In Eccardi, F. (ed.). Lacandona, el último refugio. México: Agrupación Sierra Madre S.C. and UNAM.
Simonian, L. 1999. La defensa de la tierra del jaguar. México: CONABIO, INE and IMERNAR.
Sundberg, J. 2002. Conservation as a site for democratization in Latin America: exploring the contradictions in Guatemala. Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 27(53): 73-103.
Sundberg, J. 2004. Identities in the making: conservation, gender and race in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. Gender, Place and Culture 11(1): 43-66.
Sundberg, J. 2006. Conservation encounters: transculturation in the "contact zone" of empire. Cultural Geographies 13(2): 239-265.
Tejeda-Cruz, C. 2002. Apropiación social del territorio y polÃtica ambiental en la Selva Lacandona, Chiapas. El caso de Frontera Corozal, Comunidad Lacandona. Masters dissertation. Mexico: Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo.
Tejeda Cruz, C. 2009. Conservación de la biodiversidad y comunidades locales: conflictos en áreas naturales protegidas en la Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, México.
Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 34(68): 57-88.
Tejeda Cruz, C. and C. Marques Rosano. 2006. Apropiación territorial y aprovechamiento de los recursos forestales en la comunidad Frontera Corozal, Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, México. GeografÃa AgrÃcola 37: 79-95.
Trench, T. 2002. Conservation, tourism and heritage: continuing interventions in Lacanjá Chansayab, Chiapas, Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation in Social Anthropology. Manchester: University of Manchester.
Trench, T. 2005. Representaciones y sus impactos. El caso de los lacandones en la selva lacandona. Liminar III (2): 48-69.
Trench, T. 2008a. From "Orphans of the State" to the Comunidad Conservacionista Institucional: the case of the Lacandón Community, Chiapas. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 15(5): 607-634.
Trench, T. 2008b. Regularización de la propiedad en la selva lacandona: cuento de nunca acabar. Gabriel Ascencio Franco Tuxtla Gutiérrez, UNICACH. Revista Pueblos y Fronteras 6: 1-4.
Vadjunec, J.M., M. Schmink and A.L. Greiner. 2011a. New Amazonian geographies: emerging identities and landscapes. Journal of Cultural Geography 28(1): 1-20.
Vadjunec, J.M., M. Schmink and C.V.A. Gomes. 2011b. Rubber tapper citizens: emerging places, policies and shifting rural-urban identities in Acre, Brazil. Journal of Cultural Geography 28(1): 73-98.
Van der Ploeg, J.D. 2010. The peasantries of the twenty-first century: the commoditisation debate revisited. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37(1):1-30.
Villalobos Cavazos, O. 2012. Del Lacandón a las Selva Lacandona. La construcción de una región a partir de sus narrativas y representaciones. Master dissertation. Mexico: Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2458/v26i1.23160
Copyright (c) 2019 Leticia Durand
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.