Two ontologies of territory and a legal claim in the Ecuadorian Upper Amazon
Abstract
The Secoya nation (Siekopai) of the Ecuadorian Upper Amazon, in its request for recognition of indigenous territories in a protected area, has appeared before the Republic of Ecuador's conservation regime with arguments based on an administrative and physical concept of territory. The Secoya worldview and culture, however, supposes an ontology of territory in which the geographic space, updated rituals, and their relationship with nature converge. In this article we analyze this important ontological difference in detail. We compare the territorial subjectivation processes produced by both ontologies: a Cartesian conceptual framework in the case of the State's political geography, and the Secoya's phenomenological ecology. Since the Secoya include a management plan for the protected area in their petition, it would seem they have internalized the State's rule regarding the principle of sustainability within conservation. We argue that sustainability is incompatible with the presence of a phenomenological ecology that makes them political subjects, and therefore it is a strategic inclusion that does not respond to their socio-ecological reality.
Keywords: Ecuadorian Amazon, legal request, territory, Amerindian graphism, subjectivation, ontology
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aikhenvald, A.Y. 2012. The languages of the Amazon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Allies, P. 1980. L'invention du territoire. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
(ALR) Australian Law Reports. 1992. Mabo v. Queensland. Australian Law Journal 66: 408–499.
Ardrey, R. 1967. The territorial imperative: a personal inquiry into the animal origins of property and nations. London: Collins.
Badiou, A. 2006. Being and event. London: Continuum.
Blühdorn, I. 2006. Billich will ich – post-demkratische wende und simulative demokratie. Fosrchungjournal 19(4): 72–83.
Bohn Martins, M.C. 2000. Tempo, festa e espaço na redução dos guarani. In Negro, S. and M.M. Marzal (eds.). Un reino en la frontera. Las misiones jesuitas en la América colonial. Quito: Abya-Yala. Pp. 131–138.
Bonnemaison J. 1981. Voyage autour du territoire. Espace Géographique 10(4): 249–262.
Bonnemaison, J. 1992. Le territoire enchante. Croyances et territorialités en Mélanésie. Géographie et cultures 3: 71–88.
Bryant, R.L. 2002. Non-governmental organizations and governmentality: 'consuming' biodiversity and indigenous people in the Philippines. Political Studies 50(2): 268–292.
Chaves-Agudelo, M., S.P.J. Batterbury and R. Beilin. 2015. 'We live from Mother Nature': neoliberal globalization, commodification, the "War on Drugs," and biodiversity in Colombia since the 1990s. SAGE Open Jul-Sept: 1–15.
Crouch, C. 2004. Post-democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Dean, M. 1999. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
Descartes, R. 2004 [1637-1664]. The world and other writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Descartes. R. 2016 [1618–1657]. Œuvres complètes, I. Paris: Gallimard.
Descola, P. 2013. Beyond nature and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Di Giminiani, P. 2013. The contested rewe: sacred sites, misunderstandings, and ontological pluralism in Mapuche land negotiations. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19: 527–544.
Elden, S. 2007. Governmentality, calculation, territory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25: 562–80.
Elden, S. 2010. Land, terrain, territory. Progress in Human Geography 34: 799–817.
Escobar, A. 2015. Territorios de diferencia: la ontologÃa polÃtica de los "derechos al territorio". Cuadernos de AntropologÃa Social 41: 25-38.
Espeland W.N. and M.L. Stevens. 1998. Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 313–43.
Ferguson J. 1994. The anti-politics machine: development, depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Foucault, M. 1966. Les mots et les choses. Paris: Gallimard.
Gottmann, J. 1951. La politique des états et leur géographie. Paris: Armand Colin.
Graeber D. 2015. Radical alterity is just another way of saying 'reality'. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5(2): 1–41.
Guenancia, P. 1983. Descartes et l'ordre politique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Gutiérrez, R. 2000. Propuestas urbanÃsticas de los sistemas misionales jesuitas. In Negro, S. and M. Marzal (eds.). Un reino en la frontera. Las misiones jesuitas en la América colonial. Quito: Abya-Yala. Pp. 173-184.
Haesbaert, R. 2014. Viver no limite. RÃo de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil.
Hann C. (ed.). 1998. Property relations: renewing the anthropological tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holbraad, M. 2012. Truth in motion: the recursive anthropology of Cuban divination. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Holbraad, M. 2013. Turning a corner: preamble for 'the relative native' by Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3: 469–470.
Husserl, E. 1970a. Logical investigations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Husserl E. 1970b. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Humphrey, C. 2008. Reassembling individual subjects: events and decisions in troubled times. Anthropological Theory 8: 357–380.
Ingold, T. 1986. The appropriation of nature: essays on human ecology and social relations. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Ingold, T. 1995. Building, dwelling, living: how animals and people make themselves at home in the world. In Strathern, M. (ed.). Shifting contexts: transformations in anthropological knowledge. London: Routledge. Pp. 57–80.
Ingold, T. 2016. On human correspondence. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 23: 9–27.
Inter-American Commission of Human Rights. 2009. Indigenous and Tribal Peoples' rights over their ancestral lands and natural resources. Norms and jurisprudence of the inter-American human rights system. OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc. 56/09. 30 December.
Piaguaje P.R., E. Piaguaje, O.E. Johnson and M. Johnson. 1992. Vocabulario Secoya. Quito: ILV.
Jörke, D. 2005. Auf dem weg zur postdemokratie. Leviathan 33(4): 482–491.
Keon-Cohen, B. 1993. Some problems of proof: the admissibility of traditional evidence. In Stephenson, M. and S. Ratnapala (eds.). Mabo: a judicial revolution: the Aboriginal land rights decision and its impact on Australian law. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
Killick E. 2014. Whose truth is it anyway? Anthropology of this Century 9.
Langdon, E.J. 2015. OÃr y ver los espÃritus: las performances chamánicas y los sentidos entre los indÃgenas siona del Putumayo, Colombia. In B. Brabec de Mori, M. Lewy and M.A. GarcÃa (eds.). Sudamérica y sus mundos audibles. Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag. Pp. 39–51.
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lefebvre, H. 1991. The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
Leff, E. 2010. El desvanecimiento del sujeto y la reinvención de las identidades colectivas en la era de la complejidad ambiental. Polis 27.
Malmberg, T. 1980. Human territoriality: survey of behavioural territories in man with preliminary analysis and discussion of meaning. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Marion, J.-L. 2002. Being given: toward a phenomenology of givenness. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Marion, J.-L. 2008. The visible and the revealed. New York: Fordham University Press.
Marion, J.-L. 2001. De surcroît, études sur les phénomènes saturés. Paris: PUF.
Marion, J.-L. 2010. Certitudes négatives. Paris: Grasset.
Massey D. 1999. Spaces of politics. In Massey D., J. Allen and P. Sarre (eds.). Human geography today. Oxford: Polity Press. Pp. 279–294.
Meliá, B. 1989. A experiência religiosa guarani. In Marzal, M. (ed.). O rostro indio de Deus. São Paulo: Vozes. Pp. 293–357.
Miller, D. (ed.). 2005. Materiality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Mittelstrass J. 1979. The philosopher's conception of Mathesis Universalis from Descartes to Leibniz. Annals of Science 36(6): 593–610.
Nacionalidad Siekopai. 2017. Solicitud de adjudicación de 44.882,03 hectáreas de territorio ancestral Pë'këya, a favor de la nacionalidad Siekopai (Secoya) del Ecuador (Nov. 29, 2017).
Nadasdy, P. 2008. The antithesis of restitution? A note on the dynamics of land negotiations in the Yukon, Canada. In Fay, D. and D. James (eds.). The rights and wrongs of land restitution: restoring what was ours. London: Routledge. Pp. 85-97.
Ouzouf-Marignier, M.-V. 1989. La formation des départements: le représentation du territoire français à la fin du XVIIIIe siècle. Paris: Editions de l'Ecole Pratiques de Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.
Povinelli, E. 2001. Radical worlds: the anthropology of incommensurability and inconceivability. Annual Review of Anthropology 30(1): 319–334.
Povinelli, E. 2013. Geontologies: a requiem to late liberalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
Raffestin, C. 1980. Pour une geÌographie du pouvoir. Paris: Libraires Techniques.
Reichel-Dolmatoff, G. 1978. Beyond the Milky Way. Los Angeles: UCLA Latin American Center Publications.
Reichel-Dolmatoff, G. 1986. Desana. Simbolismo de los indios tukano del Vaupés. Bogotá: Procultura.
Reichel-Dolmatoff, G. 1997. Chamanes de la selva pluvial. London: Themis.
República del Ecuador. Constitución de 20 de octubre de 2008.
República del Ecuador. Ley Orgánica de Tierras Rurales y Territorios Ancestrales. Oficio no. san-2016- 0398 Quito (Mar 7, 2016).
Robbins, P. 2012. Political ecology: a critical introduction. Chichester: Wiley.
Schechner, R. 2003 Performance theory. London: Routledge.
Scholtz, C. 2006. Negotiating claims: the emergence of indigenous land claim negotiation policies in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States. New York: Routledge.
Scott, J. 1998. Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Soja, E.W. 1971. The political organization of space. Commission on College Geography Resource Paper 8. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
Soja, E.W. 1989. Postmodern geographies: the reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.
Stewart, C. 2016. Historicity and anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 45: 79–94.
Strathern, M. 1995. Disembodied choice. In Rosen, L. (ed.). Other intentions: cultural contexts and the attribution of inner states. Santa Fé: School of American Research. Pp. 69–90.
Strathern, M. 1996. Cutting the network. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2(3): 517–535.
Sutton, P. 2003. Native title in Australia: an ethnographic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swyngedouw, E. 2009. Civil society, governmentality and the contradictions of governance-beyond-the-state. In Hillier, J., F. Moulaert and S. Vicari (eds.). Social innovation and territorial development. Farnham: Ashgate. Pp. 63-80.
Swyngedouw, E. 2011. ¡La naturaleza no existe! La sostenibilidad como sÃntoma de una planificación despolitizada / Nature does not exist! Sustainability as symptom of a depoliticized planning. Urban 1: 41–66.
Toporov, V.N., V.V. Ivanov and E.M. Meletinski. 2002. Ãrbol del mundo, diccionario de imágenes, sÃmbolos y términos mitológicos. La Habana: Casa de las Américas.
Turner, T. 2003. The beautiful and the common: inequalities of value and revolving hierarchy among the Kayapó. TipitÃ: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America 1(1): Article 2.
Turner, V. 1992. The anthropology of performance. New York: PAJ Books.
Vivas, S. (ed.). 2016. Jagágiai. Hilo y aliento de los ancestros. MedellÃn: GELCIL.
Viveiros de Castro, E. 1998. Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 4(3): 469–488.
Viveiros de Castro, E. 2012. Cosmological perspectivism in Amazonia and elsewhere: four lectures given in the Department of Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge, February–March 1998. London: HAU Books.
Wagner, R. 2001. An anthropology of the subject. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wagner, R. 2010. Coyote anthropology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Wee, C. 2006. Material falsity and error in Descartes' Meditations. London: Routledge.
Whatmore, S. 2002. Hybrid geographies: natures, cultures and spaces. London: Sage.
Wheeler, A. 1987. Gantëya Bain. El pueblo siona del rÃo Putumayo Colombia Tomo II. Bogotá: Editorial Townsend Lomalinda.
Žižek, S. 1999. The ticklish subject. London: Verso.
Žižek, S. 2002. Revolution at the gates – Žižek on Lenin - The 1917 writings. London: Verso.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2458/v27i1.23099
Copyright (c) 2020 Julián García Labrador, José Ochoa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.